Listen & identify
Understand employee experience and the conditions that may cause harm.
A clearer path from employee voice to safer work. Designed to bring employee feedback, communication patterns, calendar load and workforce trends into one view—so Australian employers can understand risks and take practical action.
For growing workplaces of around 40–200 people.
A shared view of what needs attention.
Explore workload, resourcing and recovery time with your people.
Keep consultation, decisions, owners and review evidence together.
For founders, people leaders and those responsible for workplace safety.
Workload, unclear roles and poorly managed change can be easy to miss until people are struggling. An engagement score alone doesn’t tell you what to do next.
Our approach brings employee feedback, workplace context and practical controls into one continuous process—with worker consultation throughout.
Understand employee experience and the conditions that may cause harm.
Consider exposure, frequency, duration and severity—not just a single score.
Agree practical changes to work. Record controls, owners and review dates.
Return to your people, check the evidence and adapt what isn’t working.
Bring what people tell you together with how work is happening. Patterns can guide better questions—not diagnose people or prove what caused a problem.
Assessments, targeted pulses and consultation give the numbers context.
Aggregate after-hours activity patterns, interpreted around time zones, working schedules and team context. No private-message content scanning.
Meeting load, back-to-back meetings and opportunities for focus time. A busy calendar block isn’t automatically a meeting.
Team-level headcount, turnover, absence, leave uptake and balances, and recorded overtime help reveal changes worth exploring.
A reason to ask about workload and priorities—not a conclusion about anyone’s mental health. Consult the team, adjust resourcing or meeting practices, then review whether those changes help.
Integration scope: these connections are part of the product direction and are not active in this preview. Any future use requires transparent permissions, appropriate consultation and confidentiality safeguards. All examples are fictional.
Explore a few of the areas we can help you explore. These examples are a starting point, not a complete hazard assessment.
When the amount, pace or complexity of work exceeds the time, resources or support available.
Consult workers about workload peaks, competing priorities and recovery time. Consider resourcing and work design before relying on individual coping strategies.
Honest feedback
starts with
earned trust.
In a small team, removing names isn’t enough. Confidentiality needs to shape how information is collected, combined and reported.
We’ll agree confidentiality and data-handling arrangements before an assessment begins. The examples on this site use fictional data; this website does not collect employee responses.
Psychosocial risk management includes identifying hazards, addressing risks and reviewing controls, with worker consultation. Requirements and the legal status of codes vary by jurisdiction.
Culture Field is being developed to support this work. Software does not replace an employer’s duties, professional advice or meaningful consultation.
Read Safe Work Australia’s guidance ↗Start with a conversation
Tell us about your workplace, your priorities and what you need to understand.
Set up and run your assessment
We’ll work with you to agree the scope, approach and participant information before you begin.
Plan what comes next
Discuss findings, practical priorities and how you will consult, take action and review.
Yes. We’ll help you set up and run your first assessment. Get in touch to discuss your workplace, agree the scope and work through the process together.
No. Employers remain responsible for their obligations. The planned product supports a process of consultation, assessment, action and review; it is not government-certified and does not guarantee legal compliance.
This site has no workplace integrations. Any future work-pattern integrations would need a clear purpose, appropriate permissions, worker consultation and aggregate reporting. Reading private employee messages is not part of this product preview.
Managing psychosocial risk in a growing Australian team?
We’d like to understand what would make the process easier.